When accused is minister's son

It is characteristic that casualties or their families will go to law authorization organizations to look for equity and record cases.

Notwithstanding, if the law requirement organizations decline to record the case, no possibility will be left for reasonable preliminary.

Lamentably, that happens regularly in Bangladesh.

The daily papers occasionally distribute such stories where police decline to record cases from the casualties and their families.

One such illustration is the murder instance of Sheik Azad.

An individual from decision Awami Association's childhood wing, Azad was shot and hacked to death due to a factional conflict in Mymensingh city on 31 July.

The killing occurred with no attempt at being subtle but the police declined to record the situation when the perished's better half went to Kotowali police headquarters.

Aggreived by her significant other's executing, Azad's better half documented a writ request of in the court. In the end, Mymensingh police headquarters recorded the case on Friday after a hight court arrange in such manner.

Presently, the inquiry is - for what reason was Mymensingh Kotowali police headquarters not prepared to record the case? This demonstrates a typical inclination of the law authorization in our nation - unwillingness to take bodies of evidence against compelling individuals.

Azad's significant other named Mohit Ur Rahman Shanto, child of religious undertakings serve Matiur Rahman, who is additionally the general secretary of Mymensingh city Awami Class, as the prime blamed.

The police don't take arguments against pioneers and activists of decision gathering and its partners, not to mention Mohit who is the child of a priest.

There might be no motivation to be amazed that the police had not taken cases under the steady gaze of the court arrange, but rather there are motivations to be unsettled or challenge it.

It is positively condemnable not to coordinate with the casualty. Indeed, police ought to have be the first to offer assistance to casualties.

Not recording a case before a HC arrange is by preventing the nation's run from securing law to some degree.

Azad's family, be that as it may, are as yet not diminished even subsequent to recording the case as the police couldn't capture any of the 25 denounced, including Mohit.

A clergyman's child isn't above law. Everybody is equivalent.

May we inquire as to why the charged, including Mohit, have not been captured yet? Likewise, it involves worry that the police don't look professional dynamic.

We push that police ought not think their activity is finished by recording the case after the court arrange.

To guarantee equity, law requirement should act fairly, without bowing to political impact.